I abrogate the right to eliminate things from the wiki on my own
say-so if i know that others support them. I explicitly
disenfranchised myself from doing this as an admin during my
almost-unanimous Rfa.
It is only by limiting myself to what I know beyond a doubt is
unsupportable that I consider myself fit for the responsibility of
taking unilateral action when it is actually needed.
DGG
On 6/6/07, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/6/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 6/6/07, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, he made a unilateral decision. He just happened to inform the
mailing list afterwards, he didn't do so in order to get a review of
his decision.
He made an edit. And I don't know why he informed the mailing list, but it
certainly shows that he wasn't trying to be sneaky or hide anything. Surely
he informed the mailing list knowing full well that if the community
disagrees with his edit they will reverse it.
This very odd debate about whether I have the right to remove an item
from a list on the wiki strikes me as a sideshow. The fact that ti's
happening at all suggests to me that there are a lot of editors who
have deliberately and knowingly disenfranchised themselves by
abrogating the right to edit the wiki, and expect others to follow
the.
Anthony is right, of course. I removed an item from the list, and
posted on the talk page of the article, and on this mailing list,
signalling my alarm that the item, in its present state, had been on
the list in the first place.
This is how things are supposed to happen. It's why we call it a wiki.
It's said to be a Hawaian word meaning "quick".
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l