Linking to Wikipedia Review is obviously relevant in an article on Daniel
Brandt (does it still exist) or Wikipedia criticism. Much more use can't
exist for the article space, but if we're going to discuss Wikipedia review
for example to counter attacks on people, we should be able to link to it.
Anyway, wikipediareview is a very specific case and if we were to ban it, I
don't think we need new policy that could be abused and lead to the bans of
other sites. What constitutes an attack site is subjective depending on who
you ask.
Mgm
On 4/7/07, Denny Colt <wikidenny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/7/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
Recently, [[User:DennyColt]] has created an essay article,
[[WP:BADSITES]], that advocates banning all links to sites that are
considered to be "attack sites". <snip>
Whatever microscopic benefit can be (argued by some) to be gained by
linking to a hate site like Wikipedia Review is immediately outweighed by
the harm that place and similar pages create. They openly hunt for
peoples'
identaties. They have active Jayjg and slimvirgin hunting threads, and for
others.
Do you support that? How about harassment of others like mongo, and
katefan,
and phaedriel, and so on...?
I have asked multiple people, can you think of a single GOOD reason to
link
to that site in particular, and got not one good answer, only strawmen
arguments about censorship and mccarthyism.
If you support inclusion of links to WR, shall we link to hivemind as
well,
and the encyclopedia dramatica wiki?
--
- Denny
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l