On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/7/08, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Definitely. See the following for just some of
the subjects "at arms'
length":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_comparisons
A selection:
*"The Guide Star Catalog II has entries on 998,402,801 distinct
astronomical objects searchable online."
Do we want an article on every distant object, no matter how little is
known on it? I doubt it.
I do. Are we running out of server space? To be in a catalogue, some
minimum of information has got to be known on an object.