On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/7/08, Oldak Quill oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
Definitely. See the following for just some of the subjects "at arms' length": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_comparisons
A selection: *"The Guide Star Catalog II has entries on 998,402,801 distinct astronomical objects searchable online."
Do we want an article on every distant object, no matter how little is known on it? I doubt it.
I do. Are we running out of server space? To be in a catalogue, some minimum of information has got to be known on an object.