Oh yeah, the Account Creation proccess, article upload wizard, and commons
image uploading process has some effect as well. In optimizing one or a few
times contributions, we perhaps also do not pique interest in further
content creation. On the other hand, maybe they wouldn't have even tried
before. I move to the former, based on the stats.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Keegan Paul <kgnpaul(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Keegan Paul
<kgnpaul(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/ChartsWikipediaEN.htm
<http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/ChartsWikipediaEN.htm>It's obvious of
the
peak in January of 2007.
What I'm interested in is thoughts of why New Contributors has
statistically
declined sharply, but the list of active
contributors has much less of a
slope and even less so for very active contributors.
What happened in the first six months of 2007? Did we change template
systems? Did we reword some policies relating to new users?
Careful not to mistake a decline in the derivative of a function to be
a decline in the function. The number of new contributors _must_
decline at some point, unless you hold a hypothesis that Wikipedia
will eventually be driving the growth of human population. ;)
The step function in December 2005 is clearly due to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_biography_controversy#Wikimedia_Foun…
The only thing I recall happening around June 2007 was the
introduction of a real captcha. Might be relevant if a non-trivial
amount of the new accounts were spambot sleepers!
I don't recall how those stats are generated. If they are produced
from the public data then there will be odd distortions due to
deletions hiding accounts..
I think there were also changes to the upload procedure around that
time (the interface language abuse for an upload wizard) which started
directing users to commons to upload... and uploading is a primary
reason to create an account. This seems to be at least weakly
supported by the stats on commons:
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/ChartsWikipediaCOMMONS.htm
I'd guess that like most things its probably a mixture of weak effects.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Oh sure, figures lie and liars figure. Like stereotypes, from a broad
lens, they make sense.
I think captcha probably had a good deal to do with it. Good point there
to mention. The systemization of procedures is a good point as well,
whether it be uploading or bot-assisted and the functionality of automated
tools like huggle and twinkle.
With these thoughts in mind, the good thing is that the standard userbase
numbers are consistent.
Thanks Greg, other thoughts?
~Keegan
--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan