SlimVirgin sent me the following:
"Partial, complex reverts count as reverts like any other. The problem with gaming the system, as you are doing, is that this kind of miscalculation is inevitable from time to time."
SlimVirgin is the Rogue Admin who is gaming the system. I followed 3RR policy TO THE LETTER: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3RR
"The three-revert rule is not an entitlement, but an "electric fence"; the 3RR is intended as a means to stop edit wars. It does not grant users an inalienable right to three reverts every 24 hours or endorse reverts as an editing technique. Persistent reversion remains strongly discouraged and is unlikely to constitute working properly with others."
"If you find yourself reverting a considerable amount of edits by a banned user or a vandal, it may be appropriate to block the user or IP address. If you are not an administrator, you should list the person on vandalism in progress."
The user Yuber has an established history of being blocked for 3RR and for starting revert wars on Islamic topics. He was doing so yet again.
I warned him on the Dhimmi talk page. I reported his attempt to start a revert war on the Vandalism in Progress page.
I warned him in his edit summaries about revert warring and asked him to see the talk page.
He submitted a bad-faith 3RR complaint anyways, and SlimVirgin blocked me in bad faith as fits her goal of persecuting me.
Additionally, my first and second edits are NOT reverts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revert I have only three reverts.
I expect to see an unblock notice. I am tired of being persecuted and abused by Admins with chips on their shoulders.
-Enviroknot
From: "Cranston Snord" enviroknot@hotmail.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Blocked Without Cause by Rogue Admin SlimVirgin Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 17:41:46 -0500
SlimVirgin ALSO ignored when I reported Yuber for (YET AGAIN) trying to start an edit war: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AVandalism_in_progress&...
Not that we should expect Admins to actually pay attention or operate in good faith...
-Enviroknot
From: "Cranston Snord" enviroknot@hotmail.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Blocked Without Cause by Rogue Admin SlimVirgin Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 17:36:01 -0500
That text was not the whole edit, and part of the text inserted in the original edit had been moved by Mel Etitis.
She is lying and misrepresenting my content.
3RR applies to REVERTS, not to edits. The edit I made after Mel Etitis' changes is substantially different from the first edit, and was placed with respect to Mel Etitis' concerns as listed at the talk age: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dhimmi#Edits_Today
The difference between my two edits is READILY apparent simply by looking at the diff page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=14451571&oldid...
SlimVirgin has been persecuting me ever since I arrived here a few days ago, on some personal vendetta or other.
She is a Rogue Admin, this is the second time she has lied in order to justify unfairly blocking me, and I am reporting her to this list as such. It is the only recourse I have under Wikipedia policy.
I would also like to point out that Yuber appears to have just used a sockpuppet to revert a fourth time: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dhimmi&diff=0&oldid=144611...
-Enviroknot
From: slimvirgin@gmail.com Reply-To: slimvirgin@gmail.com,English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Blocked Without Cause by Rogue Admin SlimVirgin Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:26:34 -0600
On 5/30/05, Cranston Snord enviroknot@hotmail.com wrote:
SlimVirgin has blocked me without cause after Yuber started an edit
war and
falsely claimed that I broke the three revert rule at the article
Dhimmi.
Enviroknot was reported on WP:AN/3RR by [[User:Yuber]] for a violation at [[Dhimmi]].
Enviroknot reverted four times to a previous version. The previous version is the one at 02:53 May 30. It includes the text:
"Dhimmitude is also mentioned ... in Surah 9:29 of the Koran [http://www.submission.org/suras/sura9.html 1]:
"You shall fight back against those who do not believe in GOD, nor in the Last Day, nor do they prohibit what GOD and His messenger have prohibited, nor do they abide by the religion of truth - among those who received the scripture - until they pay the due tax, willingly or unwillingly."
Enviroknot reverted to this text another four times:: at 17:12, 20:40, 20:58, and 21:18 on May 30.
For anyone wanting to check, his contribs are here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=E...
Sarah _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________ Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/