My sense is that Wikiabuse was created (a) out of a sense that
Wikipedia cannot be trusted to provide an accurate history of what's
going on in it, and (b) that there's a need to be able to look this
stuff up about admins without having to sift through dozens and dozens
of diffs and comments and such. I make no claim as to being inclined
for or against either of these-- well, the second, if well executed,
would make it easier to understand the disputes. But I see from what
little I've followed this on WR that the creators of the site are
pretty disappointed in it. And I also think it's about time that
admins accepted that they are going to be subjected to public, off-WP
criticism, and get a thicker skin about "attacks".