Bryan Derksen wrote:
The reference to the birth records were being rejected
because it just
indicated that _a_ woman with the same name, claimed birthdate, and
claimed birth location existed, not that it was the same _specific_
woman the article was about.
Against such obstinate nitpickery, what's a guy to do? I decided not to
waste my time and moved on.
Huh - now I want to abuse my admin powers just this once and change the
main page to say "the free encyclopedia that only non-freaks may edit"....
I always thought the "proof of identity" was an interesting thought
experiment, but not something any rational person did in real life!
Stan