On 9/18/06, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/18/06, Death Phoenix <originaldeathphoenix(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I voted for three people who I felt would be the
best and
most-qualified:
there is one who I think is the most qualified,
and two who are about
equal.
I wonder if I am doing my first choice user a
disservice by voting for
the
other two, and instead just vote for the one who
I think is the clear
frontrunner.
Based on the counts in the previous elections a huge number of people
only supported one... In my discussions with people I found that many
that supported only one in the election actually thought that multiple
would have done an okay job, but either didn't understand or didn't
feel comfortable with the approval voting process.
I'm one of those who are not familiar with this voting process. When I
looked at the candidates, there were a few I did not want to win, a couple
that I thought would be ok, one that I favored, and a whole bunch that I
had no opinion on. So I voted for the one I favored and the couple I thought
would be ok.
Does that seem like a sensible approach?
(Really wanting to be educated...)
-Rich
[[W:en:User:Rholton]]