On 06/10/06, Jeff Raymond
<jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
The answer is simple. Since RfAr is considered a
major roadblock to
removing adminship, make it easier to do. Then, people who you
may have
trust issues with can be more easily promoted, because they can
easily be
removed. I'm much more likely to vote support on a candidate with
a long
history, but some questions about, if I know that if they abuse
the tools
or continually do the wrong thing, I can work to get them
removed. That's
not the case currently.
In practice I don't think this is such a problem. I can think of a
couple of people who are now admins who I had pretty much this qualm
over, but who both shaped up fine after a slightly rocky start.
And deadminning is a much bigger deal than adminning by its nature.
Isn't it better to try to improve an Admin
rather than just deadmin them, at least
to start with? Deadmin should be a much
rarer process.
Even Admins respond to feedback.