On 0, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com> scribbled:
This is quite common on AfD, though, that articles are
deleted because
they are too short or stubs. Truthfully, I doubt there are many other
editors who are deleting stuff to make sure they are too short then
nominating them for deletion, but there are organism and botany
articles that I have written or watch that are a single line of text.
Was there really no material to preserve after the copy vios were
deleted? Could folks who edit pulp fiction have been asked? Could it
have been left alone after the copy vios were deleted if you simply
didn't know enough about the topic?
KP
1) I didn't see anything - the H.P. Lovecraft was literally more comprehensive than
any non-copyvio stuff. (Besides, wouldn't the non-copyvio stuff be tainted as a
derivative work?)
2) I don't know anyone who works on pulp fiction. I know of a Fiction WikiProject, but
that's about it.
3) As a blank page or sub-stub at best, I guess. Doesn't sound appealing.
--
Gwern
Inquiring minds want to know.