On 5/2/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On May 2, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Anthony wrote:
An admin who incorrectly considers something
"blatantly illegal" when
it actually is not can always be deadminned later.
Considering that this whole thing is basically a test case in whether
this is illegal or not, "blatantly illegal" seems like just about the
least useful description that could be managed here.
From U.S. Code TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 12 > § 1201
(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide,
or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device,
component, or part thereof, that—
(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing
a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work
protected under this title;