-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Phil Sandifer wrote:
Umm... see how your quote from policy says "may" be deleted, and then
the paragraph where you try to drive a contributor off jumps up to
"will be immediately deleted?"
That's the part where you got it wrong. In reality, deleting NPOV,
verifiable content on notable subjects because its creator didn't
touch third base is destructive to Wikipedia, and anyone involved in
it should be arbcommed. And if I'm ever made directly aware of it,
they will be arbcommed.
-Phil
Clearly my suggestion was not to delete NPOV, verifiable content but to
delete content that is written as part of a promotional campaign. It was
merely an assumption (based on previous examples) that an article being
written by someone in the employ of the subject is unlikely to be NPOV.
Cynical
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFEQiug8fvtQYQevcRAomcAJ45QrudfpHeI+ypbiB3gBBvExr35ACdFgkn
eVtpKyroaSS1/2K2sNxx6ZM=
=iWbq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----