Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
Yes, we've noticed. I couldn't think of a
word for it just then,
either.
"Pwnage" is the word you're looking for.
George did you the courtesy of, rather than accusing
you of
actually being something objectionable, mentioning that that's
the impression you were giving.
Um. No. He stated his "impressions." Fine. I stated my impression of his i
"impressions." Why then are you trying to take issue with me for doing
the same, albeit with more pwnage?
The underlying presumption, of
course, is that you'll be interested in changing your behavior
so as to avoid the (putatively incorrect) impression in future.
Now, the overwhelming body of evidence suggests that you have no
such interest,
So, paraphrasing, your "underlying presumption" is the important
concept here, and I somehow am supposed to work at creating a better
"underlying presumption" in your head, by expressing "interest" in
"changing my behavior" to some other mode that is less consistent with
your "underlying presumption."
At least that's my impression. :-}
and therefore that we are all quite wasting our
time by letting you engage us in elaborate discussions like this.
I would have said it differently, but as long as you get the hint that
you are just wasting your time, then that should be close enough for
you.
Someone on-wiki recently accused you of being a troll.
Who said that?
I wouldn't accuse you of that, but it is certainly
the
impression you are giving.
{{cn}}
- Stevertigo