Peter Ansell wrote:
Thats quite reasonable. Did that person actually get
banned for their
good faith action?
Wow, looks like she did:
10:33, 18 October 2006 Darwinek (Talk | contribs | block) blocked
"Aarcelay (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 hours (.numerous vandalism)
Only three hours, but IMO this _does_ put a significant black mark on
Darwinek now. I can understand not looking in sufficient detail to
notice the problems when simply reverting a blanking, but one definitely
shouldn't block someone without at least some sort of attempt at
interaction with them to confirm what's going on. And two blankings
doesn't really count as "numerous vandalism."
Bit of a surprise, really. I hadn't even considered checking this before
giving that hypothetical example.