Hi!
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:33:37 +0100, Charles Matthews wrote:
However, the talk around the page is clearly
very volatile. Your language on the talk page seemed a little too sharp for
the requirements of the situation. I prefer to bring this up here, rather
than anywhere else.
Excuse me, but on re-reading the talk page I can really not find any comment
that would warrant an extended debate on this mailing list. I do find however
that you do not seem to mind to bring up this completely unwarranted criticism
of my person on the talk page as well, so you *did* bring it up elsewhere. I
dunno, but maybe there are worthier aims of your criticism, like the people
that made the article in question into what it was yesterday. You do not seem
to be particular inclined to criticise them, are you?
Nevertheless, methinks this is an utterly pointless debate, so if you have a
_valid_ point to make, make it, and once will be enough, too. Otherwise, why
don't you do something constructive?
Alex
--
If you don't go over the top,
you can't see what's on the other side.
--- Jim Steinman ---
Alex' Assorted Homepages:
www.alexsite.de