MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
Is it just Wikipedia Review that is the issue in this
RFA or are there other
attack sites relevant to this RFA. I think there could be good reasons to
link to it in a discussion for example an RFA if doing so can make something
clear like a candidate's point of view. Of course care should used, but not
linking them at all for any reason at all is not productive.
There are no attack sites relevant to this RfA, because removing links to
attack sites has nothing to do with the extra tools an admin can use.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d-(--) s:- a-->? C++(+++)$> UL++++ P++++$ L+++>++++ E---
W++ N o++ K? w--$ O M- V- PS--(---) PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5? X-
R(+)>- tv-(--) b- DI+> D++ G>+++ e>++ h(--)>--- !r>+++ y->+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------