MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
Is it just Wikipedia Review that is the issue in this RFA or are there other attack sites relevant to this RFA. I think there could be good reasons to link to it in a discussion for example an RFA if doing so can make something clear like a candidate's point of view. Of course care should used, but not linking them at all for any reason at all is not productive.
There are no attack sites relevant to this RfA, because removing links to attack sites has nothing to do with the extra tools an admin can use.