On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:23:09 +0800, "John Lee" johnleemk@gmail.com wrote:
I think these lists have value. I can see why they would be important to a number of people. But they are not congruent with our principles as an encyclopaedia and tertiary source which does not conduct its own original research or interpretation of sources.
I agree with the second part of the statement, and kind of agree with the first part provided that the value of "a value" can be zero in at least some cases (like "list of Muslims involved in a crime" for example).
Guy (JzG)