On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:23:09 +0800, "John Lee" <johnleemk(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I think these lists have value. I can see why they
would be important to a
number of people. But they are not congruent with our principles as an
encyclopaedia and tertiary source which does not conduct its own original
research or interpretation of sources.
I agree with the second part of the statement, and kind of agree with
the first part provided that the value of "a value" can be zero in at
least some cases (like "list of Muslims involved in a crime" for
example).
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG