Yeah, that's the ticket. Wikipedia definitely needs more managers.
Wikipedia needs more people to stand up and say: "Here's a job needs, doing, let's do it." And then be willing to coordinate things until the job is done; sometimes the job is *never* done.
"Manager" isn't automatically a dirty word, you know. There's a few rotten apples :-) -- Phil [[en:User:Phil Boswell]]
The only reason the wikipedia still exists is because ordinary people are impowered to do things needing done, rather than being obligated to report to some "manager". The answer to this particular problem is decentralisation of power, not the placement of yet more power in the hands of Ed Poor. Fer Crissakes...
Jack (Sam Spade)