Well, let me put it this way: if someone (say, Admin
Example)
reverts a block on a given troublemaker for whatever reason,
then the troublemaker becomes that person's (i.e. Admin
Example's) problem. The Admin who blocked the troublemaker in
the first place should be allowed to go on with her/his
business on Wikipedia.
That's my opinion on the matter. YMMV.
Geoff
It sounds like the Admins need a coordinator or manager. I'd be happy to
volunteer for that job. (Any Admins who want me to manage them, email me
or leave me a note on my talk page.{
I've already taken on the role of Coordinator by creating and
maintaining [[Wikipedia:Account suspensions]]. It survived a vote and
has received community approval. A number of Admins have used it.
It's for those cases which are not clearcut: things other than "simple
vandalism" or "3RR violation". Anything where you're not sure enough
to
do it by yourself, quietly, but you don't want to make a big arbcom
matter out of it.
Ed Poor