On 26/03/07, Denny Colt <wikidenny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
About the current DRV... is there a reason why the
article's history is
still obfuscated? Makes it hard for non-admins to judge/evaluate fairly. I
see people saying "RS were there" and others saying "No RS was
there", but I
recall seeing some. However, it's currently just the word of people who can
see it against all else...
Shouldn't it be restored?
Well, the point of a deletion review is to decide whether or not the
article should be undeleted. Surely undeleting it in order to decide
to undelete it seems a bit odd...
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk