On 26/03/07, Denny Colt wikidenny@gmail.com wrote:
About the current DRV... is there a reason why the article's history is still obfuscated? Makes it hard for non-admins to judge/evaluate fairly. I see people saying "RS were there" and others saying "No RS was there", but I recall seeing some. However, it's currently just the word of people who can see it against all else...
Shouldn't it be restored?
Well, the point of a deletion review is to decide whether or not the article should be undeleted. Surely undeleting it in order to decide to undelete it seems a bit odd...