cohesion wrote:
On 10/8/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
wrote:
Certainly it would have been more likely then.
Stonewalling is a form
of argument, so too is "silence is consent".
I like time limits. As in, "If there are no complaints I will change
it in one week"
That's a reasonable variation of "silence is consent."
That seems to work pretty well :D Of course when you
actually want to
have a discussion about what it should be, when you aren't sure, not
so much.
Yes. Sometimes it takes a crisis of aggression to get any kind of
response, but that as often implies being associated with a particular
position in a debate, and defending positions that one has never really
taken. What do you do to just get people to sit back and reflect.
Ec