Fred Bauder wrote:
What harm to us follows from a 13 year old
administrator? Sometimes
someone tries to claim they were unfairly censored, "And by a 13 year
old". All that means is that even a 13 year old can see through their
game. I suppose there are questions of legal liability and copyright.
Generally I have been impressed by our teenagers (at least the ones
that don't add "poop" to articles).
It would suck if half of a featured article was not actually GFDL
and thus not legally redistributable. Presumably even teenagers own
the copyrights to what they produce, but I imagine that the parents
would have effective control during minority, and so at least in
theory they could claim copyright violation and ask for removal of
all their child's edits. Could be a huge headache if it was one of
our more productive teen editors...
Stan