Fred Bauder wrote:
What harm to us follows from a 13 year old administrator? Sometimes someone tries to claim they were unfairly censored, "And by a 13 year old". All that means is that even a 13 year old can see through their game. I suppose there are questions of legal liability and copyright. Generally I have been impressed by our teenagers (at least the ones that don't add "poop" to articles).
It would suck if half of a featured article was not actually GFDL and thus not legally redistributable. Presumably even teenagers own the copyrights to what they produce, but I imagine that the parents would have effective control during minority, and so at least in theory they could claim copyright violation and ask for removal of all their child's edits. Could be a huge headache if it was one of our more productive teen editors...
Stan