On 12 November 2012 16:30, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
Ken Arromdee wrote:
When they say that Wikipedia's proces for
fixing articles is
"opaque, time-consuming and cumbersome", they are *correct*.
Well, yeah, but. Right (sorta) conclusion, wrong reason.
It can always be improved, but I don't think our "process" for
fixing articles is *that* bad. And, in any case, it wasn't at
all so cumbersome that it kept Finsbury from whitewashing the
article!
The real point, surely, is whether the word "needlessly" can be
shoehorned in front of "cumbersome".
Charles