On 12 November 2012 16:30, Steve Summit scs@eskimo.com wrote:
Ken Arromdee wrote:
When they say that Wikipedia's proces for fixing articles is "opaque, time-consuming and cumbersome", they are *correct*.
Well, yeah, but. Right (sorta) conclusion, wrong reason.
It can always be improved, but I don't think our "process" for fixing articles is *that* bad. And, in any case, it wasn't at all so cumbersome that it kept Finsbury from whitewashing the article!
The real point, surely, is whether the word "needlessly" can be shoehorned in front of "cumbersome".
Charles