Mark Gallagher wrote:
<snip/>
> It was a list of blocks performed by
administrators just doing their
> jobs. The list included not merely your "victims", but also the names
> of the administrators who you thought had abused their powers. That is
> a hit list.
>
>> Mark Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> This is inappropriate.
>>>
> Raphael wrote:
>
>> Why?
> You honestly do not understand why a hit
list is an inappropriate use of
> your userspace privileges? You do not know why it is frowned upon to
> maintain a list of users you dislike?
I don't actually dislike them, instead I merely criticize some of
the blocks they made to enforce a 3 month old poll result.
<snip/>
>> And why isn't it inappropriate for
administrators to block editors
>> to "keep Wikipedia from my brand of censorship" (IIRC I haven't
>> removed the cartoons since I created my account, instead I've moved
>> them behind a link) and enforce their brand of censorship instead?
> You're implying, it seems, a
quotation. Who said they were "keep[ing]
> Wikipedia from [your] brand of censorship"?
The admin who censored my critique and blocked me did:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raphael1&diff=prev&…
<snip/>
--
Raphael