Mark Gallagher wrote:
<snip/>
It was a list of blocks performed by administrators just doing their jobs. The list included not merely your "victims", but also the names of the administrators who you thought had abused their powers. That is a hit list.
Mark Gallagher wrote:
This is inappropriate.
Raphael wrote:
Why?
You honestly do not understand why a hit list is an inappropriate use of your userspace privileges? You do not know why it is frowned upon to maintain a list of users you dislike?
I don't actually dislike them, instead I merely criticize some of the blocks they made to enforce a 3 month old poll result.
<snip/>
And why isn't it inappropriate for administrators to block editors to "keep Wikipedia from my brand of censorship" (IIRC I haven't removed the cartoons since I created my account, instead I've moved them behind a link) and enforce their brand of censorship instead?
You're implying, it seems, a quotation. Who said they were "keep[ing] Wikipedia from [your] brand of censorship"?
The admin who censored my critique and blocked me did: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raphael1&diff=prev&a...
<snip/>