The problem of systematic point of view editing will always be an important
issue and will be discussed many times on this list as we try to craft
solutions. 172 is by no stretch the most serious offender, if indeed it can
be seen as an offense. It is not covered by the current arbitration 172 is
involved in nor is it a bannable offense.
Fred
From: "Nathaniel Krause"
<nathanielkrause(a)hotmail.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:36:24 -0500
To: wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org
Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] Re: Can we ban 172 now? And VV too!
I also think that much of the recent traffic on this list about POV issues
in his articles is irrelevant to arbitration or banning, although it
arguably merits discussion separately.