On 6/18/06, Dabljuh dabljuh@gmx.net wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:04:20 +0200 Garion1000 garion1000@gmail.com wrote:
I assume you are referring to this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Dabljuh Which is interesting reading.
Garion
And that is exactly what I am talking about. You reduce the argument to "who" is talking, not on the argument itself. This sort of ad hominem is not just typical, it is downright the "Wikipedia" way of thinking these days.
Maybe, but when someone I never saw before on the mailing list (or I forgot) does a long e-mail like this on the mailing list. And when that user very recently had a RFAR filed against him and is now banned indefinitely. It's very hard to take that user or the e-mail seriously. Especially when you read the case and see the diffs. That btw has got nothng to do with editcount.
Garion