On 1/12/07, James Hare <messedrocker(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am sorry for providing only a basic idea of what I
was looking for.
No, I am not limiting the people of a niche for discussion. Anyone can
discuss things. However, more weight should be given to the opinions of the
people who KNOW what they're talking about -- this should be reflected by
their article contributions.
So the closeing admin has to dig through a load of contribution
histories before closeing an AFD?
Let's not talk about countries or things like that
-- topics are topics.
Cornwall is Cornwall, Scotland is Scotland,
Why is Scotland Scotland but Cornwall not England (assume this isn't a
test of knowlage on UK constitutional law)
Egyptian literature is Egyptian
literature,
things of that nature. I define a topic as something
that has a
main article and more articles expanding on the idea (remember: strict
definitions are instruction creep).
By that logical I can't vote on subjects relating to chemistry which I
am qualified in but could vote on subjects releated to american
canals something I know nothing about (we have an article on canals
and I have a fair number of edits in that area).
--
geni