On 1/12/07, James Hare messedrocker@gmail.com wrote:
I am sorry for providing only a basic idea of what I was looking for.
No, I am not limiting the people of a niche for discussion. Anyone can discuss things. However, more weight should be given to the opinions of the people who KNOW what they're talking about -- this should be reflected by their article contributions.
So the closeing admin has to dig through a load of contribution histories before closeing an AFD?
Let's not talk about countries or things like that -- topics are topics. Cornwall is Cornwall, Scotland is Scotland,
Why is Scotland Scotland but Cornwall not England (assume this isn't a test of knowlage on UK constitutional law)
Egyptian literature is Egyptian literature,
things of that nature. I define a topic as something that has a main article and more articles expanding on the idea (remember: strict definitions are instruction creep).
By that logical I can't vote on subjects relating to chemistry which I am qualified in but could vote on subjects releated to american canals something I know nothing about (we have an article on canals and I have a fair number of edits in that area).