Like Larry Sanger, I am still concerned about the long-term prestige of Wikipedia. As long as many contributors don't reference their claims, and don't rely on published authorities (at least to some extent), then many people in academic won't take our articles seriously. But using Wikipedia as an open-source feeder for growing Nupedia articles leverages everyone's efforts; the whole could be much greater than the sum of its parts.
Robert (RK)
That's not a bad idea. I'd like a name change though to make sure it's connection to wikipedia is known about. "Wikipedia stable" "Wikipedia 1.0" Wikipedia reviewed/approved or some such thing. But apart from that I think it might work.
Theresa