Like Larry Sanger, I am still concerned about the
long-term
prestige of Wikipedia. As long as many contributors don't
reference their claims, and don't rely on published
authorities (at least to some extent), then many people in
academic won't take our articles seriously. But using
Wikipedia as an open-source feeder for growing Nupedia
articles leverages everyone's efforts; the whole could be
much greater than the sum of its parts.
Robert (RK)
That's not a bad idea. I'd like a name change though to make sure it's
connection to wikipedia is known about. "Wikipedia stable" "Wikipedia
1.0" Wikipedia reviewed/approved or some such thing. But apart from that
I think it might work.
Theresa