On 09/02/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm, not a bad article, but this bit is worrying:
""They've got an edit provision on there for the sake of editing when
things are not accurate," Mr Mische told the Associated Press.
"I presume that if they did not want people to edit, they wouldn't
allow you to edit." "
Huh. Parse that as "They've got a provision in the Constitution for
politicians passing laws when the law needs fixing. I presume that if
they didn't want us to change all the laws [in our favour], they
wouldn't have that provision" and see how far it gets you.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk