On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
At the very least consensus can't be said to
be obvious on this, IMO.
The "we should conceal information that could potentially harm people"
argument didn't hold much weight in the recently-concluded Rorschach Wars.
There is no reasonable comparison between potential reduced
effectiveness of psychological tests and potentially provoking the
beheading of a human being.
It may not actually be as clear cut as you assume.
Psychological tests may for instance be crucial in
deciding issues in criminal cases, and as such may
have a very remote chance of affecting life and
death issues.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen