JAY JG wrote:
From: David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
> JAY JG wrote:
>> and when it came to the inevitable RfAR months
later (after which the
>> person in question was banned for over a year), none of the evidence
>> presented in the RfC was even considered.
> Er, why not? It would likely have been an
excellent start
> to arbitration evidence. Which case do you mean?
As far as I know none of the evidence in my RfC re:
Alberuni was used in
the actual findings against him.
Ah, okay. Apology on my part for not going looking, that was one of the
earliest cases I looked at.
Note to all bringing RFArs: if you've done an RFC, list it on the
Evidence page *and* explicitly reuse the evidence!
- d.