Snowspinner wrote:
Has the webcomics community developed a sufficient
non-promotional
body of thought to be taken seriously in its self-assessment of what
its important parts are?
Between the Examiner, the academic attention, the division of the
community into profitable syndicates, and people like Eric Burns, the
answer is, frankly, an unequivocal yes.
See, I agree with the above. Each is a source that can be utilised in
it's own way. I'd add the published comics press, like The Journal,
which reviews webcomics to the list, and note that newspapers reprint
and review some of the strips too.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.0/269 - Release Date: 24/02/06