On 7/20/06, ScottL <scott(a)mu.org> wrote:
I have a question about all of this. What about a
case when you are
claiming something relatively complex about something related to the
current article but not the primary subject of that article, and you
have wikilinked to the term. If the claim (or series of related claims)
are explained and referenced at the article on that topic do you need to
reference them again? If an interested reader can still find the
references by following the link do they need to be reproduced locally?
Good question, in some cases I've seen "See linked article for full
references." Be explicit about it - don't let people think we don't
actually have the sources.
Steve