On 7/20/06, ScottL scott@mu.org wrote:
I have a question about all of this. What about a case when you are claiming something relatively complex about something related to the current article but not the primary subject of that article, and you have wikilinked to the term. If the claim (or series of related claims) are explained and referenced at the article on that topic do you need to reference them again? If an interested reader can still find the references by following the link do they need to be reproduced locally?
Good question, in some cases I've seen "See linked article for full references." Be explicit about it - don't let people think we don't actually have the sources.
Steve