On 25 Oct 2005, at 09:21, MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
We already have a speedy criterion for blatant copyvio
articles and
images that are clearly unsourced are already removed on a regular
basis. If you are absolutely sure they're not free, I see no reason
not to delete them. When uploading, you are clearly reminded of the
fact it should either be free or your own. The uploading user was
warned in time.
For images we dont have any speedy delete basis that doesnt involve
the images being tagged for a week with something. Someone is
working on getting a bot to tag them, but it takes a week to get
permission to run a bot. And I am not going to tag them by hand
when I clearly should be deleting them. Over 500 files is clearly
an attempt to bring wikipedia into disrepute.
Justinc