-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 21/02/2008, Steve Bennett wrote:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Female_masturbation
What is the thinking here? When did we decide that providing access to
the sum total of human knowledge included porn? How does this enhance
our mission?
Steve
What? Why are "porn" (or, more generally, any media containing sexual
content) and "human knowledge" mutually exclusive? Forgetting the
issues about this being the en.wikipedia list and the differing
missions of these projects, what-on-Earth makes you think that images
of masturbation couldn't be informative or encyclopaedic?
- --
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org
iD4DBQFHvcVjWNupeezvVkYRAgKKAJdBrz2QyMkA0PiKXWvKKYRPfHW7AJ9mFOLy
zO1Ba10GZpHbHISRKgVYuQ==
=x4s5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----