2009/10/22 Surreptitiousness surreptitious.wikipedian@googlemail.com:
stevertigo wrote:
So the question is, how do we aggregate and sort arguments such that we can apply a meta process for quickly discerning good, valid, arguments, from those that aren't? Other than "IAR" that is?
Didn't we used to reformat discussions? Maybe we need to re-integrate that into our tool-box.
You mean refactoring? Refactoring an ongoing discussion is usually very controversial and not worth the drama. Refactoring a closed discussion might make a more useful archive, particularly I'm not sure archives get read enough to be worth the effort.