2009/10/22 Surreptitiousness <surreptitious.wikipedian(a)googlemail.com>om>:
stevertigo wrote:
So the question is, how do we aggregate and sort
arguments such that
we can apply a meta process for quickly discerning good, valid,
arguments, from those that aren't? Other than "IAR" that is?
Didn't we used to reformat discussions? Maybe we need to re-integrate
that into our tool-box.
You mean refactoring? Refactoring an ongoing discussion is usually
very controversial and not worth the drama. Refactoring a closed
discussion might make a more useful archive, particularly I'm not sure
archives get read enough to be worth the effort.