On 5/29/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That is: Gracenotes referred to BADSITES, and
SlimVirgin opposed
because he failed to oppose all links in any circumstances.
I opposed to begin with because Gracenotes posted to Wikipedia Review
in opposition to these sites being placed on the spam blacklist, and
then wrote in response to Q4: "I suppose you mean attack sites as
those in which personal attacks are made against Wikipedians, without
the intent of improving Wikipedia."
That wasn't what I meant, it wasn't what the ArbCom said, and all
these sites claim they intend to improve Wikipedia, so by that
definition, there are no attack sites. I then also opposed because of
the bot approval issue, the unclear answers, the inflated edit count
from the automated script, and the low talk page participation.