And of course, the article should warn people at the beginning that it
contains images of mohammad and direct them to the alternate page if
they don't want to see them. Sure, some people are insane fanatics,
but others aren't; I think those are simple steps that would diffuse a
lot of this.
On Feb 4, 2008 4:53 AM, Ben Yates <ben.louis.yates(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We should provide an alternate "Mohammad"
page without any images on
it. Telling people to edit their javascript is silly; most people
aren't nearly tech savvy enough to understand what that even means
(for example, they have to first understand that a web page can be
displayed differently for different users).
On Feb 3, 2008 2:33 PM, Angela Anuszewski <psu256(a)member.fsf.org> wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 12:38 PM, James Farrar
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/02/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I request they at least proof-read their petition. "holly figures"??? :)
Did you expect academic excellence from a group that advocated censorship? :)
Angela
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Ben Yates
Wikipedia blog -
http://wikip.blogspot.com
--
Ben Yates
Wikipedia blog -
http://wikip.blogspot.com