Tony Sidaway (minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com) [050120 13:02]:
csherlock(a)ljh.com.au said:
> Surely a rollback should be classed as a revert?
It's a gray area. If an admin knowingly abused
rollback power while
blocked this should probably be a summary de-admin offence, in my opinion,
but here Everyking was apparently using his rollback power to deal with
simple vandalism, which strikes me as a very admirable way to use his
suddenly acquired spare time.
The current arbcom temporary injunction on Everyking says that he gets one
edit *of any sort* per day to any article Ashlee Simpson related (and of
course he can be as convincing as he likes on talk pages so his edits are
accepted) - and that should he be blocked, using admin rollback on
Ashlee-related articles will get a de-adminning for the duration of the
case.
So far as I am aware, Everyking has not in fact abused his admin powers on
the articles in contention. If this is not the case, please let us know and
put it on /Evidence !
- d.